Trucking Blog for Jobs and Info

Affiliate Program

Make extra cash with your website, our program is free to join and it's easy to sign-up for more info Click Here

CDL Jobs

Ward Truck Load Express

Attention Drivers

What ever you do, DO NOT go to work for Ward Truck Load Express.

This company will screw you out of your money anyway they can. To start with they will tell you that you will be paid $100.00 per day for orientation this in fact is fuse they only pay $70.00 per day. The next thing they pull is, they state in orientation they is a one week hold on your pay check (work week completed on the 7th will be paid on the 14th) this is in fact untrue they hold 2 weeks (work week completed on the 7th will be paid on the 21st). This simply means you will have to wait 3 WEEKS for you first pay check.

These people are anal, all there drivers are complaining over the stupid crap the company is pulling, in the 2 weeks I worked for Ward Truck Load Express all I herd was complaints from the other drivers, one driver was suspended for 3 days because he did not sweep out his TRL, another driver was suspended for 3 days because he had to much idle time less then 25% in the WINTER compliant after compliant after compliant that’s all I herd NOTHING positive.

Now here is my complaint about Ward Truck Load Express

After working for them for 2 weeks and finding out I would have to wait another week for my first pay check I decided I had enough, when I told them I was quitting they told me I had to bring the truck back the same day I offered to return the equipment in 1 - 2 days later they stated I had to return the truck the same day because I will not be permitted to drive the truck after that, needless to say I was unable to return the equipment the same day to the Altoona PA yard, so since they told me I was unable to drive there equipment after the same day I was forced to leave the equipment in the Easton PA yard and this cost me $333.00 truck recovery they called it. These people screwed me out of $933.00, I haven’t received a Penney for my last week I worked for them, oh I got my pay stub with all kinds of bullshit deductions on it making the net pay $0.00

So I will say it again what ever you do, DO NOT go to work for Ward Truck Load Express.

Truck Driver Jobs



When’s a trucker too tired to drive?

A lawsuit filed on behalf of two out-of-state truckers against the Minnesota State Patrol points out the tricky business of regulating drowsiness on the road.

How should a state trooper decide that a trucker is too tired to drive?

That’s the question at the heart of a federal lawsuit filed by a national truckers association, which contends that the Minnesota State Patrol has illegally kept trucks off the road by using a lengthy “fatigued driving” checklist. On the list are such items as whether the driver seems dirty, disheveled, unshaven, irritable or overly agreeable, and whether his sleeping berth is “obviously unused” or has a video game system.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Minneapolis by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc., on behalf of two out-of-state drivers, points out the tricky business of regulating drowsiness on the road.

“We consider this … an outrageous abuse of police power and an intolerable violation of the civil and constitutional rights of professional truckers,” said Jim Johnston, president of the association, the largest in the nation representing professional truckers. “We see no justification for this conduct either scientifically or in rational, legitimate law enforcement.”

A State Patrol spokesman said the agency wouldn’t comment on pending litigation. The defendants are the patrol’s chief, the commander of its commercial vehicle division, and a handful of officers.

The suit says that the checklist was created by Capt. Ken Urquhart, the commercial vehicle commander, and that officers were “strongly urged” in an internal memo to use it when stopping truckers. However, the suit says, it “does not define fatigue, nor does it incorporate any medically or clinically tested and approved methods for measuring fatigue.”

The suit comes as fatigue’s role in crashes is coming under scrutiny both regionally and nationally. The same day the suit was filed, the National Transportation Safety Board questioned the sleep habits of the two pilots of the Continental Connection flight that crashed in upstate New York in February and killed 50 people. The NTSB says the copilot apparently pulled an all-nighter before the flight, and both pilots can be heard yawning on the cockpit voice recorder.

Also Wednesday, the lawyer for the truck driver blamed for a fatal bus crash on Interstate 94 east of Eau Claire, Wis., in 2005 indicated that the driver will appeal federal convictions on five counts of falsifying his driving log. The NTSB ruled that Indiana driver Michael Kozlowski had fallen asleep at the wheel of his truck, causing the crash of the bus, which was returning to Chippewa Falls, Wis., after a band field trip.

In 2007, Kozlowski was found not guilty of other charges in the crash, which killed five people and injured 28.

‘Difficult to define’

Fatigue may be gaining attention as a safety issue, but enforcement is more complicated than it is for seat belt use or drunken driving, two frequent subjects of special patrols and public education efforts.

“With blood alcohol, there’s a concentration that you can measure, and there now is a consensus that at a certain level, people are undoubtedly impaired,” said Dr. Elisa Braver, senior epidemiologist with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. “There isn’t any argument about whether this individual or that individual is impaired.

“Fatigue is much more difficult to define,” she said. “This is why the federal government has set limits on the work hours of drivers.”

The problems, Braver said, are that widely used handwritten log books are easy to falsify, and that drivers can become fatigued even if they are within the legal limits.

Hence the roadside examinations — and Minnesota’s unusual checklist.

The suit alleges that the patrol had failed to make the checklist public and used it to remove Stephen K. House of Springdale, Wash., and Gary B. Page, of Spencer, Wis., from behind the wheel in incidents in 2006 and 2008 at a weigh station on Interstate 94 near Moorhead, Minn.

The suit describes interactions that the two men had with members of the State Patrol. House was asked about his “purportedly red” eyes (he said he had allergies) and whether he was able to sleep in his berth, which he often shared with his wife and young son.

The two men said they had no prior knowledge of the checklist and say they each sustained in excess of $75,000 in damages.

‘Loopy’-sounding, but …

The Minnesota Trucking Association doesn’t have a position on the checklist, said its president, John Hausladen, but as it gets more attention nationwide, his organization is receiving calls from concerned truckers.

“We are not getting complaints from Minnesota-based carriers being put out of service,” he said. His group held a phone-in seminar titled “How Law Enforcement Recognizes Fatigue at the Roadside” in February, and a copy of the checklist can be found on its website.

“If you look at the checklist in isolation, some of the questions just look really loopy,” but the overall process to assess fatigue has merit, he said.

Other states have taken an interest in Minnesota’s approach. In Iowa, 12 officers have received training from members of the Minnesota patrol as part of a pilot program, said David Lorenzen, chief of Iowa’s motor vehicle enforcement office.

The pilot will run until Aug. 1 and then be evaluated, said Lorenzen, who cited the recession as a factor fueling driver fatigue. “People are going to take second jobs and work longer hours, and the economy makes things tougher for everyone.”

Truck drivers are “kind of like the last cowboy,” said Capt. Wayne Andrews, a former over-the-road driver who now works for the state police in Indiana, which has had several high-profile fatal crashes tied to fatigue. Indiana troopers used the Minnesota checklist for a time, then received complaints from the state trucking association and ultimately decided the list wasn’t necessary.

The New York Times, Associated Press and staff writer Paul Walsh contributed to this story. Jim Foti • 612-673-4491

Dedicated Driving Jobs



States pursue incentive to reduce truck idling

Multiple states have taken up the task this year of offering an incentive to reduce truck idling. So far, lawmakers in Maine and Virginia have signed into law rules that increase the maximum gross vehicle, axle weight limits for large trucks equipped with idle-reduction technology. Elsewhere, two states failed to adopt the rule while another bill remains active.

Starting Sept. 17, 2009, trucks in Maine that are equipped with auxiliary power units will be authorized to weigh up to an additional 400 pounds. The Virginia rule takes effect July 1.

States were granted federal authority in 2005 to allow heavy-duty trucks to exceed the 80,000-pound maximum weight limit to encourage the use of idling-reduction equipment.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has long advocated adoption of the 400-pound exemption.

“It was the intent of Congress that the 400-pound exemption become law in all states,” Joe Rajkovacz, OOIDA’s regulatory affairs specialist told Land Line. “The Association supports the exemption as reasonable because it’s another inducement to install an APU onto your truck.”

About 20 states do not allow 400-pound exceptions for APUs. Other states looking to add the provision this year have included Alabama, Florida and Indiana.

In Alabama, a bill awaiting consideration before the full Senate would adopt the 400-pound rule. The House already approved the bill – HB190 – by unanimous consent.

Supporters say that the weight exception removes the disincentive that otherwise would keep truckers from using APUs.

While the Alabama bill remains active, similar efforts in Florida and Indiana died.

The Florida bill failed to come up for consideration in the House before they wrapped up their work for the year. Previously, the Senate endorsed the effort by unanimous consent.

In Indiana, lawmakers were unable to settle their differences on the legislation to adopt the 400-pound exception. The bill remained in a conference committee when the regular session adjourned, effectively killing it for the year.

At issue was a Senate provision added to the House-approved bill to extend the total gross weight of vehicles transporting oceangoing containers from 90,000 pounds to 95,000 pounds.

Efforts in Florida and Indiana to adopt the incentive to reduce truck idling now must wait until their respective legislatures convene the 2010 regular sessions.

OOIDA Call to Action Alert - Washington members

Heads Up, Washington State truckers!

Do you pick-up or deliver in Sumner, WA?  Do you live in Sumner?  If you answered yes to either question, you need to know about a hearing scheduled for May 18 at the Sumner City Hall.

On March 23, 2009, the Sumner City Council adopted Ordinance 2286 establishing interim development regulations adopting a new definition of “private off-street parking lot.”  The definition has been amended to clarify that all private off-street parking lots be for non-commercial vehicles only. 

Ordinance 2286 was adopted to address concerns that lack of a clear definition of “private off-street parking lots” was creating unintended opportunity for the parking of commercial vehicles – especially overnight and long-term parking of those vehicles. The City believes this “unintended” trucking parking will produce negative effects including increased traffic, noise, dust, air pollution, light and glare, and “illegal activities potentially associated with this type of truck parking,” as well as negative aesthetic impacts.

What this means for area truckers is that you will likely have a difficult time trying to park your truck to make area pick-ups and deliveries. And don’t even think about stopping for food or anything else. How absurd!

A hearing will take place on May 18, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at Sumner City Hall, 1104 Maple Street, Sumner, WA.  At this meeting, the Council will hear from citizens about the new ordinance. You should make an effort to attend the hearing and speak up about the need for truck parking.  Also, you should let trucker-friendly businesses in the area know about this meeting (fuel stops, restaurants, warehouses, etc.).  They will have a vested interest in any truck parking prohibition.

If you can’t attend the meeting but would like to submit written comments, you can mail those comments to Sumner City Council, Attn:  Paul Rogerson, 1104 Maple St., Sumner, WA 98390.  You may also email the comments to Mr. Rogerson at paulr@ci.sumner.wa.us.  The telephone number for Mr. Rogerson is (253) 299-5521.

OOIDA Call to Action - West Virginia members

West Virginia truckers: Time is running out to have your say on a proposed toll hike on the West Virginia Turnpike.

Last month, the West Virginia Parkways Authority unveiled a plan to boost tolls by 60 percent for all vehicles. Parkways officials stated that they are wary of toll increases driving traffic away from the turnpike. It is important that they know that indeed is the most likely result if their plan is put to action.

On the mainline, the current base toll for five-axle commercial trucks is $4.25. That toll would increase to $6.75 as part of the turnpike plan. Tolls for passenger vehicles would increase to $2 from a base toll of $1.25 under the preferred option offered by the Parkways Authority.

Parkways officials and the firm of Wilbur Smith Associates offered 11 scenarios for consideration, ranging from no increase to an 80 percent increase for all vehicles. The 60 percent increase is their favored option.

A recent study conducted in Ohio showed commercial vehicles left the state turnpike following a toll increase. Traffic returned when the toll increase was rescinded.

Officials in West Virginia need to know that when times are tough, truckers don’t need many incentives to head for the toll-free roads.

Public hearings are scheduled to take place from 4:30 to 8 p.m. as follows:

  • Tuesday, May 19, at Riverside High School in Kanawha Co., 1 Warrior Way, Belle, WV 25015;
  • Wednesday, May 20, at Fayette County Courthouse, 100 Court St, Main Courtroom, Second Floor, Fayetteville, WV 25840;
  • Thursday, May 21, at Raleigh County Armory, Rooms C-F, 200 Armory Drive, Beckley, WV 25801; and
  • Friday, May 22, at Mercer County Courthouse, 1501 W Main St, Princeton, WV 24740.

Click here to read the hearing announcement.

The hearings will be conducted in two phases. The first phase will begin at 4 p.m. It will involve a “public forum” type-setting allowing attendees to view all available data, interact directly with Parkways Authority representatives and ask questions individually of authority representatives. Attendees who want to submit a written statement or comments may do so up until 6 p.m. After that, a “town hall” type hearing will convene where individuals can address authority members one by one.

If you cannot attend the hearing but would like to submit comments, fill out the form available here and mail it to: Parkways Authority, ATTN: “Comments on Proposed Toll Changes”, P.O. Box 1469, Charleston, WV 25325.

Authority members are expected to vote on the tolls by the end of June. Higher rates could be charged on the turnpike as soon as July.

OOIDA Call to Action - Federal Funding bill for increasing Truck Parking

 Last night, Congressman Paul Tonko (D-NY) introduced HR 2156, “Jason’s Law.” Jason’s Law is a bill that will provide grant money to increase security and expand parking areas for trucks across the country. Click here to view the bill.

Jason’s Law would create a six-year pilot program that would make $120 million available in the form of grants ($20 million per year) for local governments and private companies to address the shortage of parking for commercial vehicles.  

As a trucker, you know all too well about the shortage of safe truck parking areas across the U.S.  So, please take a few minutes to call your House member to ask for his or her support. If you are represented by Congressman Tonko or one of the original co-sponsors (Reps Michael Arcuri -NY; Betsy Markey - OH; Thomas Perriello - VA; Harry Teague - NM; John Hall - NY; Jerrold Nadler - NY; Mark Schauer - MI; or Dina Titus - NV), please thank them for their leadership in addressing this very important trucking issue.

To contact your Representative in the House, call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and provide the operator with your home zip code. The operator will connect you with the office of your House member.

You are also welcome to call OOIDA at (800) 444-5791. Association staff will be happy to provide you contact information for your elected official.

 

I NEED TO WORK !!!

I GOTTA GET A JOB!!

I’ve got over 12 yrs exp. Both reefer and dry van with 48 states otr .call 601-788-7773 or 601-270-9824 , leave your e-mail address with the person who answers. Tell them it’s for bobb ( thats me )and i’ll send my resume soonest. Thank-you

Truck Driver Jobs